Perhaps the Symbol is One of "Irony" Because It Doesn't Answer the Question →
The Symbolic Man is Expanding or Falling Apart
The Symbolism of Choice in The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman →
The Graveyard Book is about a boy raised in a graveyard by dead people and other frighting entities. It is an exciting story, and perhaps a surprise that it reflects on themes of family and fate.
Quite a few things about the book reveal the author’s intended symbolism. The role the community plays in raising a child. This ties in with the theme of fate versus free will. Choices brought the parents to death, and the child’s future followed.
Choices in the child’s life brought the fate of leaving and entering the real world. Options would follow, and we did not get to find out what they were, but the dead parents had tears in their eyes and they had their son walk to his fate, leaving the graveyard.
Symbolism in Literature and the White Whale Moments →
In literature, symbolism produces an impact by attaching additional meaning to an action, object, or name. Symbolism takes something that is actual and associates it with something else to change the meaning.
Symbols are often used repeatedly in this process, making what they usually represent well-known. Common signs used in literature include colors, animals, seasons, and weather.
In the novel “Moby Dick by Herman Melville, two interesting symbols, among many, in this novel were the ship’s captain, Ahab, and the Whale. To Ahab, the White Whale represents the power that limits and controls man. Ahab sees the whale as evil and something he has to conquer. Ahab perhaps saw himself as God-like. His nature was charismatic, but he seemed obsessed with the need for power over this whale. The name “Ahab” must have had a symbolic meaning for Melville because Ahab is named after the biblical story of Ahab in the Books of Kings 16:28–22:40, the evil idol-worshipping ruler.
Moby-Dick” was named after a real-life whale called Mocha Dick, named after the Chilean island of Mocha, where sailors first encountered him. “
The whale’s whiteness was another symbol used by the author, which was at least a symbol of fear and a metaphor for obsession. It served to focus on Ahab’s need to conquer. The choice of white as the color might imply purity or innocence, suggesting that Ahab’s focus was restoring justice through retribution, which he had made his lifetime task as the real evil. Whales tend to be light shades of dark grey, blue, brown, and black. Perhaps the symbolism in having the whale white justifies the hate because it is different.
Ahab’s chase across the oceans of the world isn’t just one that is chasing a white whale but one that is pursuing the symbolic God that the whale represents. This pursuit is not just a physical journey, but a spiritual one, where Ahab is seeking to conquer the ultimate power, which he perceives the whale to embody.
Something that someone pursues obsessively and with little chance of success is what a white whale moment has come to mean. An example of this would be referring to a problem or something that will never get finished as our white whale.' white whale moment' has come to mean. An example of this would be referring to a problem or something that will never get finished as our 'white whale ', a reference that has become a part of popular culture due to the novel's enduring influence.
The story becomes a profound investigation into the meaning of life, inviting readers to delve into their own existential questions. A significant symbol used by the author was at least a symbol of fear and a metaphor for obsession. It served to underscore Ahab’s relentless need to conquer. The choice of white as the color might imply purity or innocence, suggesting that Ahab’s focus was on.
6 only of Dr. Seuss's Books will not be published anymore →
Theodor Seuss Geisel was an American children's author, political cartoonist, illustrator, poet, animator, and filmmaker.
Six, yes only Six, of Dr. Seuss’s books by Theodor Seuss Geisel will no longer be published because of their use of the perception of offensive imagery, according to the business that oversees the estate of the children's author and illustrator.
Dr. Seuss Enterprises said in this statement:
“These books portray people in ways that are hurtful and wrong. (Because of racist and insensitive imagery)
The discontinued titles are:
“McElligot's Pool,” “On Beyond Zebra!,” “Scrambled Eggs Super!,” “The Cat's Quizzer,” “And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street,” and “If I Ran the Zoo.”
This is a subjective decision and opinion on the part of the estate and family who owns the rights to the books. They believe that those few books are still hurtful, and it is their right to make that decision, a decision we respect.
This decision was not tied to the Biden administration or the Democrats as the GOP claimed. It was a purely non-political decision, devoid of any political implications.
Dr. Seuss taught us to love the messages from the books we loved. →
Dr. Seuss was an American author, children's author, political cartoonist, illustrator, poet, animator, screenwriter, and filmmaker. He effectively used symbols to represent ideas or qualities and is known for his work writing and illustrating more than 60 books. His work includes many of the most popular children's books of all time, selling over 600 million copies and being translated into more than 20 languages by his death.
Ted Geisel was born in 1904 and took the Dr. Seuss moniker as he began writing cartoons for Look, The Saturday Evening Post, and several other magazines in 1927.
Some of his early work was criticized for containing racist images, but his later results show an evolution of values and beliefs. It seems clear that he evolved when you look at his book, The Sneetches, published in 1961. It is composed of four separate stories with themes of tolerance, diversity, and compromise
Those who knew him believed that if he were alive today, he would have jumped at the chance to be a part of the country’s evolving dialogue about diversity and inclusion.
(Dr. Seuss’s name is Theodor Seuss Geisel)
Huxley's thoughts about Orwell →
The information below is taken from an article in the Atlantic Magazine January/February 2017 issue. They stated that their thoughts were taken from this book: Letters of Note.
Aldous Huxley to George Orwell: My Dystopia Is Better Than Yours
On October 21, 1949, a few months after the publication of Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell received a letter from Aldous Huxley, whose Brave New World had been published 17 years earlier. Huxley concludes:
“Within the next generation, I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient as instruments of government than clubs and prisons and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience. In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the suffering of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World.
The change will be brought about due to a felt need for increased efficiency. Meanwhile, there may be a large-scale biological and atomic war—in which case we shall have nightmares of other and scarcely imaginable kinds."
Is What Were Doing Reflective Of What Were Capable Of? →
I wrote a review about the book Education, A Memoir by Tara Westover. This quote by her stands out as excellent advice and reflects how she approached her life.
“First, find out what you are capable of, then decide who you are.”
The quote describes what Tara Westover did with her life. She had to make the decisions on her own and take the steps on her own. She was capable of much more.
I also found this comment on the book’s inside cover:
“Educated is an account of the struggle for self-invention.”
This quote fascinated me because I wrote the book Why Life Stories Change: As You Look At Your Own Life Story, You See Yourself Differently.
The focus of my book was on how we can reinvent ourselves and how we see our past differently as we look back on it. We can change what past experiences did for us as we rethink them.
Tara Westover found out who she was, as shown in her memoir. Looking back at our life stories can help us discover who we are, and that effort can improve us.
Give some thought to your life story. Find out what you can do, and then keep doing your best.
See this website's Review of this book, Educated, A Memoir Review of this book, Educated, Memoir on this site.
My full review of this book was reprinted in the St. George Utah News
Why did Vardaman thinks his dead Mother was a Fish? →
The book and the review in this site’s book reviews of William Faulkner, As I Lay Dying, includes an interesting comment from Vardaman, one of Addie's five children, when he says after she dies that he believes “his mother is a fish.”
Addie’s coffin had been floating down the river, and it reminded him of an encounter with a dead fish earlier in his life. Vardaman had caught just a fish and cut it up into little pieces, noting that once it was cut up, it was evident that it was no longer a fish.
Even with this background, the comment Vardaman made, “My Mother is a fish” *, stands out as odd, so we may ask ourselves why Faulkner had Vardaman say this.
Perhaps it is conciseness taken to a new level, cutting unnecessary words while conveying an idea enhancing communication by eliminating redundancy.
Was it meant to be profound, symbolic, or show a poor understanding of death? Maybe it was religious, intending to show that mom was no longer in the box, but fish would be soon? Most likely, it was just a poor understanding of what death was.
The fish was previously caught and was a fish; then it was cut up, not a fish. Or, as Vardaman sees it and says it, it was a fish, and now it’s a not-fish.
Addie was his mother, and then she was not his mother, the same as for the fish; she is a not-mother, so she must be a fish.
*Vardaman Quote
“It was not here. I was there, looking. I saw. I thought it was her, but it was not. It was not my mother….It was not here because it was laying right yonder in the dirt. And now it’s all chopped up. I chopped it up. It’s laying in the kitchen in the bleeding pan, waiting to be cooked and et.”
Symbolism in the book "The Sun Also Rises" by Ernest Hemingway →
Writers use symbolism to explain an idea or concept to their readers in a poetic manner without saying it outright.
Hemingway was a master of this technique, so this book is full of symbolism, beginning with the title, but much of it boils down to a writer obsessed with masculinity. That obsession takes us to bullfighting, which is symbolic of sexual seduction when two beings face each other in a game of skill, where one wins and the,e other is hurt or even killed with a sword. Sex seems to symbolize masculinity rather than an object of i.
The story starts in Paris, which symbolizes romance, where Jake's lost love, Brett, meets with him. He tells her of a war wound that has left him impotent. Brett tells him she loves and always will, but she rejects him because of his impotence. Jake gathers some friends from the lost generation, and they go to Spain for the bullfights and other macho activities. Brett goes with them.
The chapters on bullfighting flip back and forth, complimenting their fly fishing trip, drinking, sex other very masculine activities.
Hemingway's outlook seems to be summed up by two of his characters, Cohn and Jake, when they say, "I can't stand it to think my life is going so fast and I'm not living it." "Nobody ever lives life all the way up except bullfighters."
Symbolism in Steinbeck's book, The Pearl →
A few symbolic things in this novel are The pearl, plot, characters, the ocean, and the child, but there is much more.
Kino is 3rd generation as a pearl diver, and the uncertainty of the ocean reinforces the futility of ever doing better. The scorpion represents more uncertainty with the sudden presence of evil coming into their lives. It attacks the innocent child, and to save her, they need anti-venom. Anti-evil to save an innocent child adds blame and irony to the resulting problems of good fortune. Even when the need for the anti-venom goes away, a different type of evil from those pursuing Kino and his wife kills the innocent child with a stray bullet.
The Pearl is more significant than any previous one and suggests that this low-income family's fortunes can change. When it comes time to toss the pearl back into the ocean, the pearl's great value emphasizes that well didn't come from potential wealth.